Information about 5G Towers plus Radiation Symptoms

The spectrum of frequencies used in 5G networks has been characterized as potentially human carcinogenic by the IARC. To better know the possible health hazards, it's helpful to understand the risk classifications provided by the IARC for exposure to RF-EMF. The spectrum for 5G networks is discussed within this piece, along with Dr. Curry's conflict of interest and the business.

IARC classification of exposure to RF-EMF in the Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans)

RF-EMF exposure occurs from various sources, such as personal electronics, environmental sources (such as base stations for cell phones, broadcast antennas, and medical applications) and occupational exposure. Worldwide, more than 5 billion people have cellphones, and the use is rapidly increasing. The use of cell phones is especially significant in middle and low-income countries in which more than seventy percent of adults report owning one. The use of mobile phones are also growing in high-income countries, with more than ninety percent owning one.

According to the IARC the exposure to RF-EMF could cause cancer in humans. But, the current evidence does not permit us to fully evaluate the risk from RF exposure. We are able to estimate how long exposure will cause cancer, if any.

Frequency spectrum used by 5G networks

There are many kinds of frequencies that can be used in 5G networks. Mid-band spectrum for instance, has high-speed capability but is less efficient in terms of building the penetration. However high-band spectrum is able to provide speeds up to 10 Gbps. This means it will be more efficient for 5G networks in urban areas and busy venues.

Spectrum for 5G networks depends on national regulations as well as international standard. For instance, some countries operate in the 60-64GHz band, while others don't. For instance, in the United States, the FCC has set aside 7 GHz for licence-free operation in the 57-64GHz band.

5G networks will also utilize higher frequencies than 4G. This is due to the fact that higher frequencies provide greater bandwidth than lower frequencies. The mmWave bands, for example are much larger in bandwidth than the lower bands.

Dr. Curry's conflict of interest with industry

In August 2005, Dr. Curry contacted AI Life to request an independent medical examination as well as a medical records review. She also received an examination report from her primary care physician, Dr Goodkin, and a second report from Dr Glushakow. Both doctors differed from Dr. Goodkin concluded that Curry's knees were too weak to perform regular commuting duties. On January 18, 2006, AI Life denied Curry's appeal. On April 11 of 2006, she filed an elaborate appeal to this denial. In her appeal, she cited Dr. 5g towers radiation symptom and an earful from a new medical expert, Dr. Dabrowski.

Curry's initial appeal was based on the issue the company AI Life had rejected her medical records, despite her claims that she was disabled. AI Life subsequently requested that her medical condition be reviewed by an independent physician Dr. James M. Lee, a board-certified orthopaedic surgeon. In his February 2, 2005 report Dr Goodkin found that Curry's impairment did not prevent her from or sitting in a sedentary work position. The report also stated that AI Life had not given Curry an ear modification that was appropriate for her condition.