Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Structure

If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.


The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a cell tower shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In https://rentry.co/rways to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.